One common complaint I hear about computer is how bulk some common software is. Back in the day, these programs were small enough, but it seems that as new updates were released, developers added more and more features that many people did not really use but had to keep as part of the install. These programs took longer to start and began taking up more drive space and system resources, slowing especially older computers down considerably.
The two I am going to Focus on today are Microsoft's Windows Media Player, and Adobe's Reader.
Before I continue on what seems to be a rant (OK, maybe it is a bit of a rant) I want to emphasize that there are some times when some people may want or even need some extra features built into these programs, but most often I would suggest they are more "bulk" than they are worth.
Today, I am going to recommend two free, much smaller, yet surprisingly powerful alternatives to the two programs mentioned above. I use both programs on all my computers and am very happy with them both.
The first is called Media Player Classic. MPC looks like an older version of Windows Media Player, but that is where the similarity ends. MPC is not only lighter (by far) than Windows Media Player, but it seems to run more kinds of files. For example, if you perform a fresh install of Windows XP, then try to run a DVD in the included Windows Media Player, it wont' run. It is missing a needed "codec" (don't ask, just take my word for it that you will need it) in order to actually play the DVD. MPC, on the other hand, seems to have built in the needed codec, not only for DVDs, but a huge variety of file types. As a final kicker, because of its lightness, it generally starts up more quickly and is less of a resouce hog,a dn is hence less prone to pauses and hiccups. How they developers packed all this in to 1.9 MB beats the heck out of me.
You can get it here:
You will need to manually associate the files (under edit - options) to make sure that MPC is your default player.
The second item I am recommending is called Foxit PDF reader. Nothing complicated about this one, either. It opens PDFs perfectly but much more quickly than Adobe's reader. In over 3 years of using it, I have yet to run across a situation where a PDF file did not render correctly with this product. And at a svelte 3.57MB, it is much lighter than Adobe's product and loads up way more quickly! Note that you may lose some functions like filling out forms, but I keep a (dormant) copy of Adobe on one of computers should the occasion come up for me to have such a need.
You can that one here:
There are many other good light alternatives to bloated software, but I will leave it at that for today. If you know of any good free and lighter alternatives out there, feel free to post them in the comments.
Enjoy!